R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727.pdf
Item
Zotero
Abstract Note
Wiretapping:
Criminal law — Evidence — Disclosure — Crown's obligation to make disclosure to defence — Defence informed that accuseds not primary or secondary wiretap targets in this investigation — Defence requesting to be informed of whether or not accuseds primary or secondary targets in wiretaps used in other investigations — Whether accused has right to know if a target in wiretap authorizations unrelated to investigation of current criminal charge — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 — Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, ss. 187, 189(2), 193, 196.
Criminal law — Evidence — Disclosure — Crown's obligation to make disclosure to defence — Defence informed that accuseds not primary or secondary wiretap targets in this investigation — Defence requesting to be informed of whether or not accuseds primary or secondary targets in wiretaps used in other investigations — Whether accused has right to know if a target in wiretap authorizations unrelated to investigation of current criminal charge — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 — Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, ss. 187, 189(2), 193, 196.
Date
February 23, 1995
Extra
7 pages.
Publisher
Supreme Court of Canada
Title
R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727.pdf
Attachment Title
R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727.pdf
Collection
Citation
Supreme Court of Canada, “R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727.pdf,” Deobfuscating State Surveillance, accessed November 21, 2024, https://surveillance.glendon.yorku.ca/items/show/855.